How Long To Sue For Medical Malpractice?
What are the legal timelines that apply to malpractice claims?
How does it work?
Keep reading as we have gathered exactly the information that you need!
Let’s look into the statute of limitations on malpractice to answer your question!
Are you ready?
Let’s get started!
How Long To Sue For Medical Malpractice
Some of the most common questions that is asked following a medical malpractice incident is how long can you sue for malpractice or how long is the statute of limitations for medical malpractice.
Depending on the applicable law, the timeline that you may have to sue a doctor, hospital, medical professional, or other for medical malpractice may vary.
What you need to find out is the applicable statute of limitations.
Essentially, the “statute of limitations” is the legal deadline that is provided by law for a plaintiff to file a claim or lawsuit against a defendant for medical malpractice.
The statute of limitations for medical malpractice is fairly complex so if you need to make an important decision involving a medical malpractice claim or lawsuit, you should consult with an experienced medical malpractice attorney for specific advice.
In this article, I’ll try to give you an overall view to help answer the question of how long do you have to sue for malpractice.
Let’s look at the possible application of the malpractice statute of limitations.
Medical Malpractice Statute of Limitations
The first thing to take note of is the standard medical malpractice deadline provided under your state law (the applicable laws to the medical malpractice claim).
In the United States, depending on the state laws, there may be a statute of limitations ranging between two to six years to file a lawsuit for malpractice.
Typically, the standard statute of limitations “clock” starts ticking from the moment the injury was caused or from the moment of the incident.
Let’s look at an example.
You may ask how long do you have to file medical malpractice suit?
Imagine a doctor performing the wrong surgery on the patient causing injuries.
If the state law provides a standard statute of limitation of three years for malpractice, the patient will have three years to sue a doctor for malpractice from the surgery date.
Discovery Rule In Medical Malpractice Claims
In some cases, the application of the standard medical malpractice statute of limitations may not lead to a fair outcome and as a result the law has created the “discovery rule” as an exception.
Discovery Rule Meaning
In some states, the law allows for the victim of medical malpractice to file a lawsuit within the statute of limitations timeline but starting from the moment the victim became “aware” of the injury instead of the date when the injury was actually caused.
There are instances when a doctor’s error does not manifest itself immediately but months (even years later).
If the victim did not even know he or she had a possible medical malpractice claim and the day he or she realizes that the claim existed, it would be unfair to apply the standard statute of limitations and bar the victim of a valid claim.
In such case, generally speaking, the states that have the discovery rule allow the statute of limitations clock to start running from the moment the victim became aware or had sufficient notice that he or she was harmed or of the cause of the harm.
Discovery Rule Example
For example, a doctor makes a professional mistake in not detecting that the victim was in the early development of cancer and the statute of limitations in that state is two years.
Three years later, the victim is diagnosed with advanced cancer that may be life-threatening.
It is only at this time that the victim is informed or becomes aware that the first doctor failed to properly diagnose the cancer three years earlier and has a claim for medical malpractice.
In this case, based on the standard statute of limitations, the action is time-barred.
However, based on the application of the discovery rule, the patient will have two years from the second diagnosis to file a lawsuit.
Continuous Treatment Rule
Certain states have medical malpractice statute of limitations laws stating that the legal timeline can only start ticking from the moment the patient’s treatment ended.
In other words, if a person is being treated for an illness of some kind, the statute of limitations clock will not start running until the doctor or medical professional has formally reached the end of the treatment.
If there was cause for medical malpractice, the victim will have a certain number of years to sue the doctor starting from the date the treatment was completed.
For example, if a patient undergoes medical treatment lasting a year after which point a medical malpractice claim is discovered.
If under the applicable state laws the statute of limitations is of three years, then the victim will have three years from the end of the treatment to sue.
The “Infancy” Toll And Minor Children
Another exception to the standard statute of limitations for malpractice affecting how long you have to sue a doctor is in relation to minor children.
If you wonder how long do you have to sue a doctor relating to a child, it’s important to properly look at the applicable state laws to see what deadlines are specifically provided for.
In most states, the laws are designed to provide for a specific deadline to apply to medical malpractice cases relating to minor children (those under the age of eighteen) or claims filed by a child’s legal guardian.
Statute of Repose In Medical Malpractice
The statute of repose is another key legal framework that may impact a plaintiff’s possibility of filing a medical malpractice lawsuit.
In some states, the laws provide for a statute of repose where the law sets a maximum and “absolute” limit to file a medical malpractice lawsuit from the moment of the injury was caused and regardless of when it was discovered by the victim.
Keep in mind that some states have the notion of statute of repose but don’t necessarily call it as such.
So if you were injured in a state having a stute of repose of ten years and wondering how long do I have to sue for medical malpractice, the answer is no more than ten years following the malpractice incident (regardless of the possible application of the discovery rule).
How Long Do You Have To Sue For Medical Malpractice Takeaways
So there you have it folks!
Here are some questions that some of you have in mind:
- How long do you have to file a medical malpractice lawsuit?
- What is the time limit to file a medical malpractice lawsuit?
- When is it too late to sue for medical malpractice?
- How long do I have to bring a medical malpractice claim?
If you are considering filing a medical malpractice claim, it’s crucial that you are well informed as to your legal “deadline” for filing such claims.
Every state has different statute of limitations laws defining how long you have to sue following a medical malpractice incident.
For specific legal advice in your case, you must consult with an experienced medical malpractice lawyer to answer the question of how long do you have to file a medical malpractice lawsuit.
In essence, you must look at the statute of limitations to know how much time you have to sue for medical malpractice (depending on the state laws, it can range between two to six years).
Once you know the standard delay to file suit, you can then see if there are any exceptions that may apply thereby “extending” your legal delays.
Again, depending on your state laws, you may have any of the following exceptions that may apply:
- Discovery rule allowing you to start the legal deadline clock from the moment you actually discovered there was medical malpractice
- Continuous treatment rule where the legal clock starts ticking from the moment the doctor’s treatment was completed
- Statute of repose providing an absolute deadline for filing medical malpractice claims and lawsuits regardless of treatment duration and moment of discovery
- Infancy tolling where the statute of limitations is extended if the victim was a minor
I hope I was able to answer your questions like how long after malpractice can you sue or how long can you wait to sue for medical malpractice.
Good luck!
Now, let’s look at a summary of our findings.
How Long Do You Have To Sue For Medical Negligence
You May Also Like Related to How Long Do You Have To File A Medical Malpractice Lawsuit
Acceptable care
Certificate of merit
Civil court
Continuous treatment rule
Discovery rule
Elements of medical malpractice
How to file a malpractice lawsuit
Informed consent rule
Medical malpractice attorney
Medical malpractice damages
Medical malpractice lawsuit
Medical misdiagnosis
Medical negligence
Offer of proof
Personal injury case
Professional liability insurance
Professional negligence
Statute of limitations on malpractice
Statute of repose
Toxic tort
Vicarious liability
What is medical malpractice
Wrongful death for medical malpractice
Related to Lawsuits And Medical Malpractice
Absolute liability
Attorney vs lawyer
Boutique law firm
Car accident claim
Case evaluation
Contingency fee agreement
Duty of care
Elements of negligence
General practice attorney
Gross negligence
Insurance claims
Letter of engagement
Liability cap
Personal injury defense
Personal injury lawyer
Premises liability
Product liability attorney
Retainer agreement
Specialized attorney
Social security disability
Tort reform
Workers compensation claim